sleepy
51123212c4
Harnesses under analysis: - opencode (Go-based coding agent) - pi (minimal terminal coding harness by Mario Zechner) - hermes (Nous Research agent) - forgecode (AI pair programmer with sub-agents) Each harness folder contains: - repo/: Source code from respective repositories - feedback/localllm/: Community feedback for local/smaller models - feedback/frontier/: Community feedback for frontier models Research focus: Tool handling, skills systems, prompt engineering, context management, and best practices for smaller/local models.
115 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
115 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# ForgeCode Pricing & Cost Feedback Report
|
|
|
|
**Topic:** Pricing tiers, cost concerns, value proposition
|
|
**Source References:** ForgeCode Blog, Reddit r/cursor, GitHub issues
|
|
**Date Compiled:** April 9, 2026
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Pricing Structure (As of July 27, 2025)
|
|
|
|
### Free Tier
|
|
- **Cost:** $0 (permanent, not a trial)
|
|
- **Limit:** Dynamic request limit (adjusts based on server load)
|
|
- **Typical Range:** 10-50 requests/day
|
|
- **Purpose:** Full feature exploration without time pressure
|
|
|
|
### Pro Plan
|
|
- **Cost:** $20/month
|
|
- **Limit:** Up to 1,000 AI requests/day
|
|
- **Target:** Regular users scaling up from free tier
|
|
|
|
### Max Plan
|
|
- **Cost:** $100/month
|
|
- **Limit:** Up to 5,000 AI requests/day
|
|
- **Target:** Power users
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Early Access Insights
|
|
|
|
### Usage Patterns Discovered
|
|
- **Top 1% of users:** Made thousands of AI requests daily
|
|
- **Power user costs:** Over $500/day in AI inference costs during heavy usage
|
|
- **Growth:** 17x surge in signups, 10x spike in usage during early access
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Community Feedback
|
|
|
|
### Reddit r/cursor
|
|
**Mixed reactions to pricing:**
|
|
|
|
> "ForgeCode is VERY good. I tested it by resolving failed CI tests using Python and Go code, and it proved efficient and persistent."
|
|
|
|
> "What a sad news but it really good to solve my real problem with around 10 requests. If it refresh 1000 token daily I think it still OK unless u are building a quantum codebase"
|
|
|
|
**Comparison to alternatives:**
|
|
> "Cursor has models to efficiently index your codebase, while forgecode doesn't, so consider it to be worse than both. However, this looks like a good deal to me bc of the pricing."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Cost Considerations
|
|
|
|
### Token Usage Concerns
|
|
From DEV Community analysis:
|
|
> "Nobody's published hard numbers. ForgeCode's multi-agent setup (forge/sage/muse spawning sub-agents) almost certainly burns more tokens per session. I noticed it anecdotally but didn't measure."
|
|
|
|
### API Key Requirements
|
|
- ForgeCode requires **own API keys** (not included in subscription)
|
|
- Separate billing from Claude Pro/ChatGPT Plus
|
|
- Can become expensive with heavy usage of premium models (Opus 4.6: $15/$75 per million tokens)
|
|
|
|
### Daily Limit Issues
|
|
**GitHub Issue #1296:**
|
|
- Problem: Reaching daily FORGE limit stops task mid-execution
|
|
- Context built up is lost or must wait for reset
|
|
- User requested ability to switch providers when limit reached
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Value Proposition Analysis
|
|
|
|
### For Light Users (Free Tier)
|
|
- **Pros:** 10-50 requests may be sufficient for small projects
|
|
- **Cons:** Dynamic limits unpredictable; may hit cap during intensive sessions
|
|
|
|
### For Regular Users (Pro - $20/month)
|
|
- **Pros:** 1,000 requests/day is generous for most workflows
|
|
- **Cons:** Must also pay for API usage separately
|
|
|
|
### For Power Users (Max - $100/month)
|
|
- **Pros:** 5,000 requests/day accommodates heavy usage
|
|
- **Cons:** Expensive when combined with API costs; $100 + $500/day inference = $15,100/month potential
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Cost Optimization Tips
|
|
|
|
1. **Use context efficiently:** ForgeCode's context indexing reduces token usage ~90%
|
|
2. **Choose models carefully:** Opus 4.6 is expensive ($15/$75); consider Sonnet for routine tasks
|
|
3. **Monitor sub-agent spawning:** Multi-agent workflows consume more tokens
|
|
4. **Set FORGE_TRACKER=false:** Reduces overhead (minor but measurable)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Comparison with Alternatives
|
|
|
|
| Tool | Pricing Model | Notes |
|
|
|------|---------------|-------|
|
|
| **ForgeCode** | $0-$100/month + API costs | Pay for harness + pay for inference |
|
|
| **Claude Code** | $20/month subscription | Includes model access |
|
|
| **Cursor** | $20/month subscription | Includes model access |
|
|
| **Aider** | Free (open source) | Bring your own API keys |
|
|
|
|
**Key Difference:** ForgeCode is the only one with dual payment (harness subscription + API costs).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Source References
|
|
|
|
1. **ForgeCode Blog:** https://forgecode.dev/blog/graduating-from-early-access-new-pricing-tiers-available/
|
|
2. **Reddit r/cursor:** https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1maq1ex/forgecode_is_no_longer_free_and_unlimited_but/
|
|
3. **GitHub Issue #1296:** https://github.com/antinomyhq/forgecode/issues/1296
|
|
4. **DEV Community:** https://dev.to/liran_baba/forgecode-vs-claude-code-which-ai-coding-agent-actually-wins-36c
|